<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blipr: The Story of an iPhone App</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.return7.com/blipr-the-story-of-an-iphone-app/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.return7.com/blipr-the-story-of-an-iphone-app</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Morgan</title>
		<link>http://blog.return7.com/blipr-the-story-of-an-iphone-app/comment-page-1#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>James Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.return7.com/?p=456#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>Great Article, Amro. In relation to your experience on this product, what do you feel keeps an app from becoming that &quot;next big thing&quot;?

You mentioned the initial offering being so good that extra &quot;packs&quot; weren&#039;t generally desired. Do you think that if this weren&#039;t the case that it was the only thing holding the app back from becoming an underground hit? How did the marketing of the app factor into this? Do you feel better or worse about apps that take an idea (in this case, instant messaging) and improve upon it, or do you see users as being more apt to reward complete innovation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article, Amro. In relation to your experience on this product, what do you feel keeps an app from becoming that &#8220;next big thing&#8221;?</p>
<p>You mentioned the initial offering being so good that extra &#8220;packs&#8221; weren&#8217;t generally desired. Do you think that if this weren&#8217;t the case that it was the only thing holding the app back from becoming an underground hit? How did the marketing of the app factor into this? Do you feel better or worse about apps that take an idea (in this case, instant messaging) and improve upon it, or do you see users as being more apt to reward complete innovation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Klein</title>
		<link>http://blog.return7.com/blipr-the-story-of-an-iphone-app/comment-page-1#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.return7.com/?p=456#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>Can you send blips by email to people? If not, you should add that and recommend the recipient to get the app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you send blips by email to people? If not, you should add that and recommend the recipient to get the app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davide Di Cillo</title>
		<link>http://blog.return7.com/blipr-the-story-of-an-iphone-app/comment-page-1#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>Davide Di Cillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.return7.com/?p=456#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>Sure it could sound like a failure in terms of profits, but if those 13k are mostly active users, then they are sitting on a great launch platform for their next app that maybe will be more profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it could sound like a failure in terms of profits, but if those 13k are mostly active users, then they are sitting on a great launch platform for their next app that maybe will be more profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->